Barringer v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GARRISON, Judge.
Jeremy W. Barringer (“Movant”) ap*495peals from the denial of his Rule 24.0351 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Movant alleges that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing and relief under his motion because his plea counsel was ineffective for withdrawing his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. We affirm.
Movant was charged by indictment with five counts of first-degree burglary, one count of second-degree burglary, one count of attempted first-degree burglary, and one count of forcible sodomy. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the State dismissed four of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Leisure v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Wilkins v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cook v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Edmonds v. SteeleDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020