Legal Opinion

Howard v. Pullicino

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 5, 1975No. 12192PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHANNON, Justice.

Appellant, Kennis K. Pullicino Howard, has appealed from the judgment of the district court of Comal County which changed the privileges of appellee, Anthony D. Pul-licino, to visit with his minor children. We will reverse that judgment and remand the cause to the district court.

The appellee has filed no brief. Appellant’s factual statement of the record has neither been answered nor challenged. Under these circumstances, this Court will accept appellant’s brief as correctly stating the facts and the record without resorting to the statement of facts. Texas Rules of Civil…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Leithold v. PlassTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Boney v. BoneyTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Horton v. County of MillsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Rodgers v. WilliamsonTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Hollis v. HollisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Files v. ThomassonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Vasquez v. Vasquez, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1982
  5. Horne v. HarwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API