Legal Opinion

Shourek v. Stirling

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 8, 1993No. 37A05-9207-CV-255PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARTEAU, Judge.

Frank Shourek, in his capacity as administrator of the estate of Lillian Jonas ("Estate"), appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Suzanne and Jack Stirling on the Estate's claim of conversion. The Estate alleges Suzanne converted approximately $65,000 from bank accounts which Jonas and Suzanne owned as joint tenants. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Stirlings. The Estate appeals, arguing that the trial court incorrectly applied Indiana law.

We affirm.

FACTS

Shortly after her husband died, Lillian Jonas added the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. Sitzmark Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Rogers v. RogersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Marathon Petroleum Co. v. Colonial Motel Properties, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. P.M.S., Inc. v. JakubowskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Yoder Feed Service v. Allied Pullets, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shourek v. StirlingIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Saler v. IrickIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Shourek v. StirlingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Shourek v. StirlingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Shourek v. StirlingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API