Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Andrade v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided February 7, 2008No. 14-05-01227-CRPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKem Thompson Frost, Justice

I respectfully disagree with the majority’s analysis of the third issue in which appellant complains the trial court erred by denying him the opportunity to make offers of proof.

Offers of Proof

Texas Rule of Evidence 103(b) provides in relevant part that an “offering party shall, as soon as practicable, but before the court’s charge is read to the jury, be allowed to make, in the absence of the jury, its offer of proof.” TEX. R. EVID. 103(b). The right to make an offer of proof is absolute and the trial court does not have discretion to deny a request to make an offer of proof. See Spence v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Spence v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Rivera v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  3. Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Rice v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API