Legal Opinion
State v. Noel
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided January 17, 1910No. 17,745PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from Twenty-Ninth Judicial District Court, Parish of Plaquemines; R. Em-met Hingle, Judge. Polite Noel was convicted of larceny, and he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtProvo Sty, J.
The information against the defendant reads:
“Did steal and carry away a number of hides, 13 mink and 5 coon hides, the property of Leopold Bayhi, which said hides were valued at twenty-seven and 50/100 dollars, contrary,” etc.
Defendant pleaded not guilty, and his case was fixed for trial. On the day of trial he filed a demurrer, based on the fact that the word “feloniously” was absent from the information. That this word, or the full equivalent of it, is essential in an indictment for larceny, is so well established that citation of authority on that point can hardly be necessary. See,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. KennedyLouisiana Court of Errors and Appeals · 1845
- State v. HauserSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
- State v. FlintSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
- Newman v. ShellySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
- State v. LeoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chabert v. SánchezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1921
- State v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- State v. QuinnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
- Chabert v. SánchezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1921