Legal Opinion

Roche v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 24, 1985No. 65022PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

462 So.2d 1096 (1985)

James William ROCHE, Petitioner,

v.

STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 65022.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January 24, 1985.

Fred Haddad of Sandstrom & Haddad, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Wallace E. Albritton, Asst. Atty. Gen. and Frank A. Graham, Resident Counsel, Dept. of Agriculture, Tallahassee, for respondent.

EHRLICH, Justice.

We examine the decision of the First District Court of Appeal, Roche v. State, 447 So.2d 890 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), in light of a question certified as being of great public importance, pursuant to jurisdiction granted in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Frank v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Florida Dept. of Agriculture and Consumer Services v. HaireDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. DEPT. OF BUSINESS v. Calder Race CourseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API