Legal Opinion

United States v. Feltman Bros.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 25, 1935No. 3852Published

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

Certain silk footwear (called bootees) for babies, which footwear had been elaborately embroidered, was classified by the collector under paragraph 1529 (a), Tariff Act of 1930, the pertinent provisions of which paragraph read as follows:

Par. 1529 (a). * * * and fabrics and articles embroidered * * * all the foregoing, and fabrics and articles wholly or in part thereof, finished or unfinished (except materials and articles provided for in paragraph 915, 920, 1000, 1111, 1504, 1505, 1513, 1518, 1523, or 1530 (e), or in Title II (free list), or in subparagraph (b) of this'paragraph), by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. KahnCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. United States v. ShokaiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API