Brunt v. Farinholt-Meredith Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
■ Three appeals from the Circuit Court of Anne Arundel County in Equity (Brashears, J.). The.facts, are stated in the opinion, of the Court. The three causes were argued together before Boyd, C. J., Briscoe, Burke, Thomas, Pattison, Stockbridge and Constable JJ.
1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, C. J.
The three appeals of Henry Brunt v. Farinholt-Meredith Company, Mary Coale Dugan v. Same, and The National Junior Republic of the City of Baltimore v. Same, were argued together.
The firm of De Waard and Sons, contractors and builders, entered into a contract with each of the appellants for the erection of a house — those of Mr. Brunt and Miss Dugan being in Annapolis and that of the National Junior Republic being at Annapolis Junction, in Anne Arundel County. The Farinholt-Meredith Company furnished materials for the three houses at the request of the contractors, and, having filed Mechanics’…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Trustees of the German Lutheran Evangelical St. Matthew's Congregation v. HeiseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
- Hensel v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
- Thomas v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
- Watts v. WhittingtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
- Rust v. ChisolmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
3Cited by13 opinions
- Noland Company, Inc. v. Allied Contractors, Incorporated, and Maryland Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
- District Heights Apartments v. Noland Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- T. Dan Kolker, Inc. v. ShureCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Parker v. Tilghman v. Morgan, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
- Gill v. MullanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.