Legal Opinion

City of Bridgeton v. Kessler

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 4, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The prosecutor was convicted in the mayor’s court of the city of Bridgeton of a violation of section 1 of its ordinance No. 298, approved July 11th, 1922, and July 17th, 1922, in that the prosecutor did cause to be operated, partly over the *262streets of the city of Bridgeton, an auto bus or jitney without having obtained a license therefor.

Section 1 of the ordinance alleged to have been violated provides: “All auto buses or jitneys operated or to be operated over specified routes, wholly or partly within the limits of the city of Bridgeton, shall be licensed, the drivers thereof shall obtain…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Asbury ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  2. State v. MillerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API