Legal Opinion

Aronson v. Wertheim

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 15, 1897Published

Appeal by defendant from judgment of the Fifth District Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The defendant employed the plaintiff under a written contract made August 22, 1896, whereby the latter agreed to do all the fire-proofing and all the mason work to finish up the four houses, Eos. 230, 232, 234 and 236 Cherry street for $275, to be paid as follows: “ When all fire-proofing and door sills are set, $60; When all window sills are filled inside and outside, $40; when all arches are in the staircase, $100; when all the work is completed, $75..” ' : -I-;:;;

The plaintiff testified that after he had completed the work under this contract, and about September 18, 1896, he had a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. DutcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Woolsey v. . FunkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Tilden v. TildenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API