United States v. Stange

LUSE, District Judge.

Shortly after the filing of the original opinion in this matter, defendant’s counsel submitted a memorandum brief objecting to and stating grounds for their objection to the inclusion in the judgment in this case of interest at the rate of 6 per cent, from the dates when the taxes were paid. Counsel for plaintiff have filed a reply brief.

While counsel for defendant endeavored to. distinguish this ease from Mason v. Routzahn, 275 U. S. 175, 48 S. Ct. 50, 72 L. Ed. 223, and other cases referred to in the main opinion herein, they also relied largely upon the provisions of…