Legal Opinion

Willard City v. Woodland

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the district court of the first district and from an order overruling a motion to vacate and set aside the judgment and verdict. Section 3402, 2 Oomp.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the district court of the first district and from an order overruling a motion to vacate and set aside the judgment and verdict. Section 3402, 2 Oomp. Laws, 1888, 295 is: The party-intending to move for a new trial, must, within ten days after the verdict of the jury, if the action was tried by a jury, or after notice of the decision of the court or referee, if the action was tried without a jury, file with the clerk, and serve upon the adverse party, a notice of his intention, designating the grounds upon which the motion will be made, and whether the same will be…

1Opinion of the Court

AsdeRSOH, J.:

The plaintiff brought suit against the defendant before a justice of the peace, for taxes in the sum of $5.10. As the questions we are called upon to decide arise on the pleadings, it becomes necessary to set them out in full. The complaint is as follows, to-wit: “Plaintiff complains and alleges that defendant became, and was on the 31st day of October last (1889), indebted to plaintiff in the sum of five dollars and ten cents ($5.10) as and for taxes due said city for the year 1889, on real estate and personal property of said defendant in said city, which defendant has refused…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. WittramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Williams v. MecartneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Jordan v. WalkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  4. Jordan v. WalkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pleasant Grove City v. HolmanUtah Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API