Dupuy v. Arceneaux
Supreme Court of Louisiana
from the Third Judicial District Court, parish of St. Martin. Gates, J.
1Opinion of the CourtLudeling, C. J.
This is an action on two promissory notes. The judgment by default was made final, and the defendant has appealed.
Our attention has been directed to the following errors apparent on the face of the record; that the citation„does not express the year in. which defendant is to answer; that the citation expresses that the defendant must file his answer in ten dags, while the sheriff’s return shows that the defendant’s residence is twenty-two miles from the court house.
Article 17Í) of the Code of Practice, section five, requires that the ;l oitation must express the number of days given to the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Comire v. Schiro Amusement Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Noyola v. Norske Lloyd Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Sullivan v. SullivanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
- Le Blanc v. TrahanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
- Longing v. Home Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932