Legal Opinion

Tillinghast v. Boston, &c., Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 3, 1893PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Before Hudson, J., Hampton, October, 1892. These were two actions heard together — W/' S. Tiliinghast against the Boston and Port Boyal Lumber Company and the S. C. Forsaith Machine Company, and James W. Moore against the S. C. Forsaith Machine Company.

Read the full summary

Before Hudson, J., Hampton, October, 1892. These were two actions heard together — W/' S. Tiliinghast against the Boston and Port Boyal Lumber Company and the S. C. Forsaith Machine Company, and James W. Moore against the S. C. Forsaith Machine Company. For former report, see 38 S. C., 319. The letter referred to in the opinion was as follows: Manchester, N. H., 5-5, 7 92. W. S. Tülinghast, JEsg., Hampton G. H, 8. G. Dear Sir: In accordance with our promise by wire, we write you concerning the subject of your telegram to us on the 27th, reporting that Mr. Mitchell has returned and given us a…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice McIver.

These two cases were origi*486nally heard and considered • together by this court during November term, 1892, and on the 21st of February, 1893, this court filed its opinion, affirming the orders appealed from; as may be seen by reference to 38 S. C., 319. Subsequently the appellants filed petitions for rehearing, which were granted (38 S. C., 324), and the cases were reheard during the present term of this court. As we still think there are some differences in the facts of the two cases, notwithstanding the opinion of counsel to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Mexican Central Railway Co. v. PinkneySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Sugg v. ThorntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dyar v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  2. Recreonics Corp. v. Aqua Pools, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1986
  3. Brays Island Plantation, Inc. v. HarperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  4. Coopman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Hendrix v. HendrixSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API