Legal Opinion
Enos v. Werlatone, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 1, 2009PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*713Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the Supreme Court properly granted reargument and, upon reargument, properly granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Glenn Werlau and Christel Werlau which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, which alleged causes of action sounding in common-law negligence and violations of Labor Law § 200. These defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 325 [1986]). The evidence demonstrated that the plaintiffs accident…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Comes v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Lombardi v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Ortega v. PucciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Kwang Ho Kim v. D & W Shin Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Allan v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- La Veglia v. St. Francis HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Portalatin v. Tully Construction Co.-E.E. Cruz & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Allan v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012