Legal Opinion

In the Matter of: Andrew D. Thomas

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 2015No. 82S00-1305-DI-386PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Attorney Discipline Action

2Per curiam

We find that Respondent, Andrew Thomas, engaged in attorney misconduct by, among other things, neglect of a client’s case, pervasive mismanagement of his attorney trust account, and conversion of client funds. For this misconduct, we conclude that Respondent should be suspended for 240 days without automatic reinstatement.

This matter is before the Court on the report of the hearing officer appointed by this Court to hear evidence on the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission’s “Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action,” and on the post-hearing briefing by…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re NewmanIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In Re BrizziIndiana Supreme Court · 2012

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. In the Matter of: Everett E. Powell, IIIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  2. In the Matter of Justin R. WallIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  3. In the Matter of: Narles W. ColemanIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  4. In the Matter of: Douglas L. KrasnoffIndiana Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API