Legal Opinion

Florida East Coast Railroad v. Schumacher

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1912PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Duval County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Per curiam

— In an action for personal injuries to the wife caused by the running of a railroad train the verdict and judgment awarded $800.00, .to the husband for expenses incurred on account of the injury to the wife and' also $8200.00, to the wife. It is conceded that the latter amount included punitive damages, and this is as signed and urged as error.

The statute authorizes the recovery of compensation “for any damage done to persons, stock or other property, by the running of” a railroad company’s train. Allegations in the declaration that the railroad company, through its servants and agents, was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Florida Railway & Navigation Co. v. WebsterSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
  2. Florida Southern Railway Co. v. HirstSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
  3. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. MooneySupreme Court of Florida · 1898

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. McRobertsSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. HayesSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. ShouseSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
  4. Jackson v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  5. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. Co. v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API