Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ordunez v. Bean

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 18, 1979No. 60322Published

1ConcurrenceClinton, Judge

The Texas Speedy Trial Act deprives prosecuting attorneys of their right to exercise judgment and discretion in performing their exclusive prosecutorial functions. It also trenches upon power and authority of state trial courts to manage their affairs, including control of their dockets as in Moore v. State, 94 Tex.Cr.R. 489, 251 S.W. 1086 (Tex.Cr.App.1923) and Art. 33.08, V.A. C.C.P. The Act is therefore subject to an attack that its effects violate the separation of powers provisions of Article II of the Constitution of the State of Texas.

The Court, however, not being pressed in this cause…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State Ex Rel. Vance v. RouttCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. United States v. Vincent RollinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. Vincent RollinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API