Legal Opinion
Larry E. Santos v. Daniel E. Lungren, and P. Koehane, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 29, 1996No. 94-16209Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
78 F.3d 594
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Larry E. SANTOS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Daniel E. LUNGREN, and P. Koehane, Warden, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-16209.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Feb. 12, 1996.
Decided Feb. 29, 1996.
Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reed v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lefkowitz v. NewsomeSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Robert Alton Harris v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Lamont Hudson v. John Moran, Sheriff, Clark County, Nevada Brian McKay Attorney General, State of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- People v. CellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.