Legal Opinion

Borough of Kenilworth v. Corwine

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 7, 1951No. Civ. No. 880-50PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEANEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff instituted this action in the Superior Court of -New Jersey, seeking strict foreclosure of fifteen tax sale certificates. The United States having removed the action to this court under the provisions of section 1444 of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S. C.A. § 1444, moves to dismiss on the ground that the jurisdictional requirements of Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 24.10, are not met.

Under a statute formerly in effect, substantially similar to that embodied in 28 U.S.C.A. § 2410, Judge Avis of this court held that consent to be "sued in a strict foreclosure proceeding had not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Integrity Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. O. E. Morrison and R. E. MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  2. Miners Sav. Bank of Pittston, Pa. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Kasdon v. G. W. Zierden Landscaping, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1981
  4. United States v. O. E. Morrison and R. E. MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API