Gilliam v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.
Conviction is for possessing for the purpose of sale whisky in a dry area, the punishment assessed being a fine of $100.00.
There appears in the record a request that the appeal be dismissed, but same is signed only by appellant’s attorney. A request for dismissal must be executed by the appellant in person and properly authenticated. See 4 Tex. Jur., p. 497, sec. 347; Jennings v. State, 68 Tex. Cr. R. 613, 151 S. W. 1050; Catron v. State, 63 Tex. Cr. R. 377, 140 S. W. 226.
The State’s pleadings are in proper form to charge the offense, and there is no statement of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Catron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Jennings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Burton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
3Cited by6 opinions
- Conners v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
- Page v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Ex Parte TrislerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Ex Parte TrislerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Hypolite v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.