Legal Opinion

Crosby v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 22, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with using a controlled substance after a sample of his urine twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. He was found guilty of the charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

Contrary to petitioner’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Van Dusen v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Zippo v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Cooper v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of Benitez v. AnnucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. Smith v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Matter of Walker v. AnnucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. Moretti v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API