Legal Opinion
The Florida Bar v. Quick
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided June 6, 1973No. 42152PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
279 So.2d 4 (1973)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,
v.
Garrett D. QUICK and Rutheled B. Wolter, Respondents.
No. 42152.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 6, 1973.
Charles M. Harris, Titusville, for complainant.
Horton and Perse, Miami, for respondents.
2Per curiam
In this Bar discipline proceeding, we review a recommendation of the referee dated December 10, 1971, that respondents, Garrett D. Quick and Rutheled B. Wolter, be found guilty of violations of Article XI, Rule 11.02(4) of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, 32 F.S.A., and Rule 27 of the Additional Rules Governing the Conduct of Attorneys, 32 F.S.A. The…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.
3Cases cited2 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. RaymanSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
- The Florida Bar v. SchonbrunSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
4Cited by11 opinions
- In Re the Discipline of DorothySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- The Florida Bar v. McClureSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- The Florida Bar v. PriceSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- In Re Florida Bd. of Bar ExaminersSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- The Florida Bar v. LopezSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.