Yaste v. Rust
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple
The plaintiff, Virgil Yaste, appeals from the court’s order dismissing his complaint for a writ of mandamus for the defendant Fulton County Superintendent of Highways to repair and maintain a certain roadway. We reverse.
For our purposes, the statutory terms “road” and “highway” are synonymous. (See Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 121, par. 2 — 202.) Section 6 — 401 of the Illinois Highway Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 121, par. 6 — 401) provides that after landowners present a proper petition alleging that a certain road needs repair or maintenance, the county superintendent of highways shall…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brockhausen v. BochlandIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co. v. Road District No. 10Illinois Supreme Court · 1933
- Meade v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
3Cited by4 opinions
- Feldker v. CrookAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Hart v. Town of ShafterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Chamness v. MaysAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Hart v. Town of ShafterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004