Legal Opinion

Yaste v. Rust

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 4, 1988No. 3-87-0318PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple

The plaintiff, Virgil Yaste, appeals from the court’s order dismissing his complaint for a writ of mandamus for the defendant Fulton County Superintendent of Highways to repair and maintain a certain roadway. We reverse.

For our purposes, the statutory terms “road” and “highway” are synonymous. (See Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 121, par. 2 — 202.) Section 6 — 401 of the Illinois Highway Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 121, par. 6 — 401) provides that after landowners present a proper petition alleging that a certain road needs repair or maintenance, the county superintendent of highways shall…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brockhausen v. BochlandIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co. v. Road District No. 10Illinois Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Meade v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Feldker v. CrookAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  2. Hart v. Town of ShafterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. Chamness v. MaysAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  4. Hart v. Town of ShafterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API