Legal Opinion

Birmingham News Co. v. McConnell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 17, 1932No. 6 Div. 105PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This is an action of assumpsit by the appellant against appellees, F. G. McConnell, Jr., and C. D. McConnell, late partners in business under the firm name of McConnell Auto Exchange, to recover the price of advertising purchased by the partnership, and furnished by the plaintiff under a written contract made between the parties on the 15th day of. October, 1927, before the dissolution of the partnership.

The complaint, upon which the case went to the jury, consists of the common counts, on account, account stated, and for work and labor done. The plea was the general issue, pleaded in short…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. CheneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  2. Brannum v. Wertheimer-Swartz Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Style Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Graham v. Malone Freight Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API