Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Hines

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 2011No. 2011-0309PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

On February 24, 2011, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline filed a final report in the office of the Clerk of this court pursuant to BCGD Proc.Reg. 11(D), in which it accepted the agreement entered into by the relator, Disciplinary Counsel, and the respondent, Dean Edward Hines. The agreement set forth the misconduct and the agreed recommended sanction of a public reprimand. The board recommended that the agreement be accepted.

On consideration thereof, it is hereby ordered by the court, sua sponte, that the recommended sanction is rejected. It is further ordered that…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. WhitfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API