Legal Opinion

Sharpley v. Wright

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 30, 1903No. Appeal, No. 92PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal, No. 92, Jan. T., 1902, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., Sept. T., 1900, No. 547, on verdict for plaintiff in case of William Sharpley v. Thomas H. Wright. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before McMichael, J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $1,750. Defendant appealed. Error assigned was in submitting the case to the jury.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Mestbezat,

The plaintiff was injured while in the service of the defendant and this action was brought to recover damages for his injuries, which he alleges were caused by the negligence of the defendant. Thomas H. Wright, the defendant, was a stevedore, and contracted with W. S. Taylor & Company to pile lumber for them on their wharf on Delaware avenue, in the city of Philadelphia. William S. Sharpley, the plaintiff, was employed by the defendant to assist in this work. In performing the work, the defendant’s employees used a derrick owned and erected by Taylor & Company…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. OliverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  2. Connelly v. FaithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  3. Johnston v. Ott Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Paul v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  2. Lindgren v. William Bros Boiler Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  3. Carson v. Dierks Lumber Coal CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  4. Dravo Corporation v. CopelandMississippi Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Sparkman Hardwood Lumber Co. v. McCannSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API