Legal Opinion

Pacelli v. Augustus Intelligence, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 11, 2020No. 1:20-cv-01011Unknown

1Opinion

USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: nnn nnn conc canna nanan ccnnc nana □□□ cncc nana ncn casa KK DATE FILED:__ 5/11/2020 MARCO PACELLI and ED CRUMP, Plaintiffs, □ : 20-cv-1011 (LJL) ~ OPINION AND ORDER AUGUSTUS INTELLIGENCE, INC., : Defendant. LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: This is a fraudulent inducement and breach-of-contract case. Defendant Augustus Intelligence, Inc. (‘Augustus’) moves to compel Plaintiffs Marco Pacelli and Ed Crump (“Plaintiffs”) to arbitration and to stay the litigation. For the following reasons, the motion is…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API