Legal Opinion
Bridgeport Guardians, Inc. v. Delmonte
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 12, 2009No. Civil No. 5:78cv175 (JBA)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*310RULING ON MOTIONS TO INTERVENE
JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge.
More than twenty-five years after judgment entered in this case involving race discrimination in the Bridgeport Police Department (“BPD”), several individuals have moved, pursuant to Federal Rule of Procedure 24(a)(2), to intervene and object to an order proposed jointly by the Bridgeport Guardians, Inc. (“Guardians”) and the City of Bridgeport (“City”). In their Joint Proposed Order [Doc. # 1743], the Guardians and the City sought an eighteen-month interim modification to the 1983 remedial order, having the objective of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Texas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Diamond v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Northeastern Florida Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bridgeport Guardians, Inc. v. DelmonteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Bridgeport Guardians, Inc. v. DelmonteDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009