Legal Opinion

Hain v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 29, 1993No. F-88-466Published

1Opinion of the Court

852 P.2d 744 (1993)

Scott Allen HAIN, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-88-466.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

April 29, 1993.

Rehearing Denied and Mandate Issued September 14, 1993.

John Thomas Hall and Elaine Meek, Tulsa, for appellant.

Robert H. Henry, Atty. Gen., Carol Price Dillingham, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.

OPINION

LANE, Judge:

Appellant, Scott Allen Hain, was convicted of two counts each of Murder in the First Degree, Kidnapping, Robbery with Firearms, and Larceny of an Automobile and one count of Arson in the Third Degree after a two stage jury trial…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Zant v. StephensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API