Lainhart v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHNSON, JUDGE:
Sonya Lainhart (“Lainhart”) appeals from an order voiding her pretrial diversion and imposing her three-year sentence for flagrant nonsupport. She argues that the Jackson Circuit Court, in voiding her diversion, agreement, made insufficient findings of fact under both Commonwealth v. Andrews, 448 S.W.3d 773 (Ky. 2014), and Commonwealth v. Marshall, 345 S.W.3d 822 (Ky. 2011). We agree, and must therefore VACATE AND REMAND for the court to make the required findings. •
BACKGROUND
The facts leading up to the voidance of Lainhart’s pretrial diversion are not in dispute.'…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brewer v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
- Commonwealth v. AndrewsKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
- Commonwealth v. JonesKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Alyssa Bagby v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2020
- Amy Hudson v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022
- Antonio Sallee v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2023
- Brandy Spurling v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022
- Carl R. Churchill v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.