Consolidated Fruit-Jar Co. v. Whitney
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
[In equity. Bill by the Consolidated Fruit-Jar Company against Thomas H. Whitney, Samuel A. Whitney, John L. Mason, and the Standard Union Manufacturing Company, to restrain the infringement of certain patents.]
1Opinion of the Court
NIXON, District Judge.
This is.a motion for a preliminary injunction. The answer of the defendants to all the material allegations of the bill is full and complete. Assuming, as I am bound to do at this stage of the proceedings, that it is true, the application must be refused, unless the judgment in the court of common pleas of the city and county of New York, in the suit brought by the complainant against John L. Mason, John K. Chase, and Henry F. Johnson, declaring fraudulent and void the two licenses granted by Mason to Chase for the letters patent No. 22, 129, and No. 22,-18G, is held to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Campbell v. . HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Stuyvesant v. HallNew York Court of Chancery · 1847
- Hopkins v. M'LarenCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1825
- Consolidated Fruit Jar Co. v. MasonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1876
3Cited by3 opinions
- McMullen v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
- Bate Refrigerating Co. v. GillettUnited States Circuit Court · 1887
- Consolidated Fruit-Jar Co. v. WhitneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1876