Hulsman v. Deal

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

Action in ejectment. The plaintiff recovered subject to a lien for taxes and improvements. The defendant appeals and insists that the plaintiff, having parted with his title, was not the real party in interest.

*717The quarter section in controversy was in possession of a tax-deed holder, but was owned by the plaintiff, who had within one year from his majority made sufficient tender to redeem, which tender was refused. (Hulsman v. Deal, 82 Kan. 518, 108 Pac. 849.) He traded this and another quarter for certain personal property valued at $1600.…