Legal Opinion

Dana Lease Finance Corp. v. Commissioner of Revenue

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 20, 2002No. 99-P-1774Published

1Opinion of the CourtKaplan, J.

We affirm a decision of the Appellate Tax Board holding that the taxpayer herein exceeded the time limit prescribed by statute for filing its applications for abatement of the net worth measure of its corporate excise and that, accordingly, the Commissioner of Revenue (commissioner) correctly denied the applications.

The taxpayer, Dana Lease Finance Corp. (DLF), classified as a “foreign,” “intangible property” corporation, filed returns reporting one component of its corporate excise, the net worth measure, for the tax years 1989, 1990, and 1991, on the dates, respectively, September 15 of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Board of Assessors v. Suffolk Law SchoolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. New Bedford Gas & Edison Light Co. v. Board of AssessorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Koch v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  4. McCarthy v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Springdale Finishing Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API