Legal Opinion

Tap Electrical Contracting Service, Inc. v. Roberts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 27, 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Determination and order of the Commissioner of Labor of the State of New York, dated February 3, 1984, finding that petitioner had willfully violated subdivision 3-e of section 220 of the Labor Law by paying an employee as an apprentice rather than at the prescribed rate for an electrician during a period in which the employee was not individually registered as an apprentice, and further finding that petitioner had also violated section 220 of the Labor Law by *549paying five other employees as laborers and not electricians, and directing reimbursement to the employees with interest, and…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nash v. New York State Department of LaborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Monarch Electrical Contracting Corp. v. RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. INTERNATIONAL UNION (DISTRICT) v. NEW YORK STATE DEPT. OF LABORAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. International Union of Painters & Allied Trades, District Council No. 4 ex rel. Stevens v. New York State Department of LaborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. International Union of Painters & Allied Trades, District Council No. 4 ex rel. Stevens v. New York State Department of LaborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API