Legal Opinion

Robert v. Adams

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1869PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Third District, Santa Clara County The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCrockett, J.

The only point in this appeal which we deem it necessary to discuss is whether or not, under the third subdivision of Section 219 of the Practice Act, a stallion, not used as a work horse on a farm, but kept for the service of mares, is exempt from execution.

The subdivision in question exempts from execution “the farming utensils and implements of husbandry of the judgment debtor; also, two oxen, or two horses, or two mules, and their harness, four cows, one cart or wagon, and food for such oxen, horses, cows or mules, for one month.” The Act does not, in express terms, make this exemption…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wilson v. MadisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Bertozzi v. SwisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Murphy v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. In re the Estate of BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Kreig v. FellowsNevada Supreme Court · 1892

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API