Legal Opinion

In Re Terrill

United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided January 5, 1987No. 19-70210PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM V. ALTENBERGER, Bankruptcy Judge.

Approximately four years ago, the Debtors filed a Chapter 7 proceeding and obtained a discharge in bankruptcy. They have now filed a Chapter 13 proceeding, and their plan proposes to pay 100% to certain secured creditors and 0% to all their unsecured creditors. Because of their previous Chapter 7 discharge within a six year period, Section 727 of the Bankruptcy Code would prevent a discharge in a subsequent Chapter 7 proceeding, however, the Debtors could obtain a discharge from their obligations if their Chapter 13 plan was confirmed.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb, Debtors. In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb v. Harry W. Heid, Chapter 13 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. Margaret Ann Deans v. Gerald O'donnell, Trustee, in Re Margaret Ann DeansCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  3. In Re DeSimoneUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  4. Matter of CiottaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1980
  5. In Re FrankUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re SchmickUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 1988
  2. In Re SchaitzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API