Legal Opinion
In Re Brill
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 16, 2004No. 18-36984PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
CECELIA MORRIS, Bankruptcy Judge.
On October 19, 2004, the Court heard oral argument on the Trustee’s Motion for an Order Reducing, Expunging and/or Modifying Claims and Creditor Peter Brill’s Opposition thereto. On November 12, 2004 and November 22, 2004, respectively, counsel for the Trustee and the creditor pro se filed responsive briefs. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds Creditor Peter Brill’s Proof of Claim unenforceable against the estate because it is time barred pursuant New York Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 213, and thus disallows the claim…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lew Morris Demolition Co. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Roth v. MichelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Clarkson Co. Ltd. v. ShaheenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Vengroski v. Garden InnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Banco do Brasil S. A. v. State of Antigua & BarbudaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Faulkner v. Arista Records LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Lynford v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Faulkner v. Arista Records LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- In Re HessUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- In re Metex Mfg. Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.