Legal Opinion
Gottlieb v. Isenman
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided August 27, 1954No. 4836PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on March 4, 1954, granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
The complaint may be summarized as follows: The plaintiffs Arthur Gottlieb and Michael Pariser are citizens of New York. The defendants George A. Isen-man and Manuel Isenman are citizens of Massachusetts and the defendants Beacon Chemical Industries, Inc., is a Massachusetts corporation. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship and the required amount. From about January, 1942…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Peckham v. Ronrico CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
- Fitzpatrick v. GilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Elliott v. KazajianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Armco Steel Corporation, a Corporation v. Realty Investment Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Jack A. Rainier, in No. 13337 v. Champion Container Company, Irwin R. Weiner, in No. 13338, Ira Earl Robinson and Harry A. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Country Gas Service, Inc. v. United States of America, Country Gas Distributors, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- United States v. New England Merchants National BankDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1979
- Oakley v. Duerbeck Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963