Legal Opinion

Maryland Insurance Commissioner v. Kaplan

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 16, 2013No. 12PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDonald, j.

CareFirst has a unique public and charitable mission under State law to ensure affordable and adequate health care for *284Maryland residents. In light of that mission it enjoys a variety of tax and other benefits under the law. State law confers broad authority on the Maryland Insurance Commissioner (“Commissioner”) to oversee its operation and its adherence to its mission.

As this Court noted in 1994, because CareFirst has no shareholders, the Commissioner has -an enhanced role in preventing abuses and misuse of corporate funds. One concern is the payment of excessive executive…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maryland Insurance Administration v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  2. Maryland Insurance Administration v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API