Legal Opinion

United States v. Cordova

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 22, 2006No. 05-6093, 05-6094PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge.

On March 9, 2005, Defendant-Appellant Armando Cordova, II, stipulated to allegations by his probation officer that he failed to comply with the terms of his supervised release. Based on the stipulation, the District Court revoked Mr. Cordova’s supervised release and sentenced him to 36 months’ incarceration. On appeal, Mr. Cordova argues that the revocation of his supervised release violated his Sixth Amendment rights to indictment by a grand jury, to a jury trial, and to be found “guilty” of violating the terms of his supervised release beyond a reasonable doubt.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. United States v. HaymondSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. United States v. GanttCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. DeesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  4. People v. HarperMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  5. United States v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API