Swayze v. State, Department of Transportation & Development
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
I,WILLIAMS, Judge.
The plaintiff, Frank Swayze, appeals a district court judgment in favor of the defendants, State Department of Transportation and Development (“DOTD”) and the City of Winnsboro. The court dismissed the plaintiffs claim for compensation for a feed-store building located on property expropriated by the State. For the following reasons, we affirm.
FACTS
In the late 1800’s, the Missouri Pacific Railroad (“Railroad”) acquired a right-of-way over lands owned by the ancestors in title of Nell Carter Ramage Williamson. The lands are located within the city limits of Winnsboro,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lindsey v. PooleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. v. WilliamsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Illinois Central RailroadLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
- STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVEL. v. ManuelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- State, Dotd v. Louisiana Nat. BankLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
3Cited by1 opinion
- McCormick v. HarrisonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006