Legal Opinion

Swayze v. State, Department of Transportation & Development

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 17, 2001No. 34,679-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

I,WILLIAMS, Judge.

The plaintiff, Frank Swayze, appeals a district court judgment in favor of the defendants, State Department of Transportation and Development (“DOTD”) and the City of Winnsboro. The court dismissed the plaintiffs claim for compensation for a feed-store building located on property expropriated by the State. For the following reasons, we affirm.

FACTS

In the late 1800’s, the Missouri Pacific Railroad (“Railroad”) acquired a right-of-way over lands owned by the ancestors in title of Nell Carter Ramage Williamson. The lands are located within the city limits of Winnsboro,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. PooleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. v. WilliamsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Illinois Central RailroadLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVEL. v. ManuelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. State, Dotd v. Louisiana Nat. BankLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McCormick v. HarrisonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API