Legal Opinion

Sipowicz v. . Lehigh Valley Railroad Company

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1921PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, in each of the above-entitled actions, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 12, 1919, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict. The first action was to recover for personal injuries alleged to' have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant.

Read the full summary

Appeal, in each of the above-entitled actions, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 12, 1919, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict. The first action was to recover for personal injuries alleged to' have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant. The second action was to recover for a father’s loss of services and medical expenses by reason of personal injuries received by his son through the alleged negligence of defendant. Theodore Sipowicz, a boy eight years of…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment in each case affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chase, Hogan, Cardozo,.Pound and Crane, JJ. Dissenting: His cock, Ch. J. and McLaughlin, J.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baker v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Knight v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, W.D. New York · 1948
  3. Knight v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, W.D. New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API