Sipowicz v. . Lehigh Valley Railroad Company
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, in each of the above-entitled actions, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 12, 1919, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict. The first action was to recover for personal injuries alleged to' have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant.
Read the full summary
Appeal, in each of the above-entitled actions, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 12, 1919, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict. The first action was to recover for personal injuries alleged to' have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant. The second action was to recover for a father’s loss of services and medical expenses by reason of personal injuries received by his son through the alleged negligence of defendant. Theodore Sipowicz, a boy eight years of…
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment in each case affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chase, Hogan, Cardozo,.Pound and Crane, JJ. Dissenting: His cock, Ch. J. and McLaughlin, J.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Baker v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Knight v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, W.D. New York · 1948
- Knight v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, W.D. New York · 1948