Legal Opinion · Dissent

Alexander v. Oregon State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 13, 1989No. A-5-88-091; CA A49303Published

1DissentRossman, J.

The majority concludes that, if an escaped prisoner violates the Department’s rules of conduct while he is outside the walls of the institution, he cannot be punished for those violations. By so holding, the majority permits this inmate to author his own justice. Because I believe that the rules do cover petitioner’s misconduct, I respectfully dissent.

This court previously has addressed the circumstances under which an individual is subject to the Correction Division’s rules of conduct. In Shobe v. OWCC, 28 Or App 657, 660, 560 P2d 676, rev den 278 Or 393 (1977), we stated the rule:

“The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kneefe v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  2. State v. HutchesonOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. DillenburgCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Shobe v. Oregon Women's Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API