Legal Opinion

Rhind v. Freedley

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 12, 1906PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On rule to show cause.

1Opinion of the Court

'The opinion of the court was delivered by

Swayze, J.

This case was tried before the court without a jury; the court found in favor, of the plaintiff and allowed a rule to show cause. The objection that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence seems to be properly before us; the objection to the rule of damages adopted by the court involves a legal question which was not presented to the court below, and therefore is not now the subject of review. Mills v. Mott, 30 Vroom 15; Jackson v. Traction Company, Id. 25.

*139The court found that the contract was contained in the plaintiff’s letter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kellogg Bridge Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Hoe v. . SanbornNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. Mills v. MottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Locks Laboratories, Inc. v. Bloomfield Molding Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. McFadden v. ShanleyArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Gruen v. George A. Ohl & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  4. Triplett v. NicholsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API