Rhind v. Freedley
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On rule to show cause.
1Opinion of the Court
'The opinion of the court was delivered by
Swayze, J.
This case was tried before the court without a jury; the court found in favor, of the plaintiff and allowed a rule to show cause. The objection that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence seems to be properly before us; the objection to the rule of damages adopted by the court involves a legal question which was not presented to the court below, and therefore is not now the subject of review. Mills v. Mott, 30 Vroom 15; Jackson v. Traction Company, Id. 25.
*139The court found that the contract was contained in the plaintiff’s letter…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kellogg Bridge Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Hoe v. . SanbornNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Mills v. MottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
3Cited by4 opinions
- Locks Laboratories, Inc. v. Bloomfield Molding Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- McFadden v. ShanleyArizona Supreme Court · 1914
- Gruen v. George A. Ohl & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
- Triplett v. NicholsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924