Legal Opinion

Hillman v. Stumph

Indiana Superior Court

Decided July 1, 1873PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewcomb, J.

Stumph and Lefever executed three promissory notes, payable at different periods, and a mortgage on real estate to secure the same, to one Gilbert. The mortgage was duly recorded, after which the note last payable was assigned by Gilbert to one Jesse Jones, and by the latter to the plaintiff. The mortgage was never assigned by Gilbert. The notes were all paid except the last. When that became due, Stumph, one of'the mortgagors, offered and was ready to pay it to Jesse Jones, plaintiff’s attorney in fact, but demanded of the latter that on payment being made the mortgage should be satisfied of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sample v. RoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Gower v. HoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Plunkett v. DillonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1871
  2. Fitzsimons v. BaumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863
  3. Wright v. McAlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
  4. Plunkett v. DillonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1872

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API