Hillman v. Stumph
Indiana Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtNewcomb, J.
Stumph and Lefever executed three promissory notes, payable at different periods, and a mortgage on real estate to secure the same, to one Gilbert. The mortgage was duly recorded, after which the note last payable was assigned by Gilbert to one Jesse Jones, and by the latter to the plaintiff. The mortgage was never assigned by Gilbert. The notes were all paid except the last. When that became due, Stumph, one of'the mortgagors, offered and was ready to pay it to Jesse Jones, plaintiff’s attorney in fact, but demanded of the latter that on payment being made the mortgage should be satisfied of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sample v. RoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Gower v. HoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by4 opinions
- Plunkett v. DillonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1871
- Fitzsimons v. BaumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863
- Wright v. McAlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
- Plunkett v. DillonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1872