Meeks v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Appellant was convicted of trafficking in oxycodone and sale of delivery of alprazo-lam. He appeals the summary denial of his "three-claim’ motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm the summary denial of points one and two without further comment. However, we reverse and remand as to point three, where appellant claims trial counsel misadvised him that - if he testified at trial he could be cross-examined as to .the details of his prior criminal record. See Hicks v. State, 666 So.2d 1021, 1023 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Curtis v. State, 689 So.2d 423, 424 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Hope v. State, 960…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hicks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Hope v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Curtis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997