Legal Opinion

Quality Aero Technology, Inc. v. Telemetrie Elektronik, GMBH

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided May 3, 2002No. 5:00-CV-931-BO(3)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WEBB, United States Magistrate Judge.

This Cause comes before the Court upon Plaintiffs (“QAT”) Motion to Compel Discovery. (DE 30). Defendants Telemetrie Elek-tronik (“datatel”) and General Electric (“GE”), have responded (DE 33), and this matter is now ripe for adjudication.

BACKGROUND

datatel is a German manufacturer of telemetry equipment for use in measuring the performance of high-speed rotating machinery and engines. GE is a multi-national corporation which, for the purposes of this action, purchased products manufactured by datatel. Plaintiff is a company that provided sales and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Ameristar Jet Charter, Inc. v. Signal Composites, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. Convatec Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2010
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. New Horizont, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. Convatec Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2010
  4. Thai Le v. Diligence, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
  5. Beteselassie v. Porcelana Corona de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.District Court, D. Kansas · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API