Legal Opinion

Drury v. Henderson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1892PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Second District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Mercer county; the Hon. John J. Glenn, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholfield

The question here is, whether the lower courts correctly held the Statute of Limitations to be a bar to the right to foreclose the mortgages described in the bill.. In our opinion this depends entirely upon whether the Limitation act of November, 1849, or that of April, 1872, is applicable to the facts sufficiently proved to constitute, in legal effect, a new promise, for the evidence is insufficient to prove a payment upon the specific indebtedness secured by either mortgage within ten years before the filing of the bill, and without such proof no payment can be held to revive the debt.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Walker v. WarnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Wellman v. MinerIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Metcalf v. MetcalfAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920
  4. Vail v. RynearsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Joseph v. CarterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API