Legal Opinion

Karns v. Liquid Carbonic Corp.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 15, 1975No. [No. 168, September Term, 1974.]PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellant, William J. Karns (Karns), was injured on June 30,1972, while operating the truck of his employer, appellee, Liquid Carbonic Corporation (Liquid Carbonic). The Workmen’s Compensation Commission found “that the claimant’s conduct was wilful due to alcoholic intoxication.” For that reason, the claim was disallowed. On appeal to the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County the jury determined that the injury did not result solely from intoxication but did result from willful misconduct. Accordingly, the determination of the Commission was affirmed. The Court of Special Appeals affirmed in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Von Ette's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Thomas v. CorsoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  3. Gonier v. Chase Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  4. Ætna Life Insurance v. CarrollSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  5. Thomas v. Police CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. LahockiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  2. Schweitzer v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Howell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Wal Mart Stores, Inc. v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Board of Education v. SpradlinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API